What an independent architectural verdict actually does
This is a bounded architectural judgment action — not implementation takeover. It resolves a specific, blocked decision with jurisdiction.
What goes in
- Landscape — S/4, BTP runtimes, entry surfaces, identity
- Observable runtime divergence — by tenant, path, or surface
- Timeline of change — go‑live, rollout, recent changes
- Ownership map — who holds what today
- The decision that cannot converge
What gets assessed
Boundary validity and jurisdiction across trust, routing, and identity assumptions — including tenant implications and lifecycle exposure — with a focus on which contracts must change versus remain.
What comes out
A written verdict that you can forward without context. It defines:
- What must change
- What must remain
- Where jurisdiction actually sits
- What can be escalated internally afterward
What this is not
- Not implementation rescue
- Not staff augmentation
- Not generic consulting
- Not a blame exercise
Need the short version? See What This Is Not.