Skip to content
Jiandong Pei

SAP BTP & Enterprise AI Architecture — Boundary Model

Contact

Send a one-page architecture summary for SAP BTP and enterprise AI decisions where responsibility boundaries are unclear. No forms. No funnels.

What to include

  1. Landscape: S/4HANA or other core systems, SAP BTP runtime(s), agents, workflows, extensions, integrations, and identity surfaces.
  2. Business action or extension scenario: what the user, assistant, agent, workflow, extension, or core system is expected to do.
  3. Current symptom: what works locally, what fails in the real path, and what cannot be explained.
  4. Systems involved: S/4HANA, BTP services, CAP, AppRouter, Work Zone, XSUAA/IAS, destinations, HDI, agents, workflows, RAG, tools, or external systems.
  5. Identity / tenant / data / integration / lifecycle surfaces involved.
  6. Timeline: go-live, rollout, AI pilot, model/tool/prompt/workflow/API change, or recent architecture change.
  7. Teams or stakeholders involved.
  8. The decision that cannot converge.
  9. Desired next step.

Copyable intake template

Subject: SAP BTP Boundary Review Request - [Company / Situation]

1. Landscape:
2. Business action or extension scenario:
3. Current symptom:
4. Systems involved:
5. Identity / tenant / data / integration / lifecycle surfaces involved:
6. Timeline:
7. Teams or stakeholders involved:
8. Decision that cannot converge:
9. Desired next step:

Send to

Send structured summary Use full intake page Work With Me

Expectations

I reply with whether the situation matches a SAP BTP boundary failure pattern, enterprise AI responsibility-boundary problem, or a narrower implementation issue. If appropriate, I suggest a fixed-scope next step. No marketing follow-ups.